In a split decision of six to one, the Supreme Court struck out a suit filed by the Attorney General of Osun State against the Attorney General of the Federation (AGF), in relation to the dispute over the withheld allocations due to local governments in the state.
The Apex Court held that the Osun state Attorney General has no legal right to have instituted the case on behalf of the 30 local governments in the state.
That Court held that those who won the local government election and having been inaugurated are the jurisdict persons that can sue and be sued directly.
The Court held that the federal government was wrong in withholding the local government fund adding that the action was in grave breach of the 1999 Constitution.
Justice Mohammed Idris who read the lead judgment said that the hand of the federal government was soiled in its decision to unjustly seize fund and admonished it to strictly ensure that the funds are directly channeled to local accounts.
The Court dismisses AGF’s contempt allegations against Osun adding that he was in more contempt than Osun by not paying the fund as required by law.
Justice Idris however said that since there was no evidence that Osun Attorney General was briefed by the local governments, he ought not to have filed the case on their behalf.
In a minority judgment by Justice Emmanuel Agim, disagreed with the six other justices, holding that Osun Attorney General has the right to institute the case.
Justice Agim said that the action of the federal government in withholding the local governments funds was in bad taste because it was capable of crippling the activities of the Councils.
