• Advert Rate
Tuesday, May 20, 2025
  • Login
TVC News
  • World News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Tech
  • Health
  • Entertainment
  • Show
    • Election 2023
    • Journalist Hangout
    • Issue With Jide
    • Trending Video
  • More
    • Advert Rate
    • Contact Us
    • Cookies Policy
No Result
View All Result
  • World News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Tech
  • Health
  • Entertainment
  • Show
    • Election 2023
    • Journalist Hangout
    • Issue With Jide
    • Trending Video
  • More
    • Advert Rate
    • Contact Us
    • Cookies Policy
No Result
View All Result
TVC News
No Result
View All Result

Court Orders VDM To Pay Costs To Falanas

May 20, 2025
in Latest Nigeria News
Court Orders VDM To Pay Costs To Falanas
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

A Lagos High Court sitting in Ikeja has ordered a social media celebrity, Martins Vincent Otse, a k a VDM to pay costs of two hundred thousand naira (N200,000:00) after it dismissed the preliminary objections he filed against the defamation suits of human rights lawyer, Femi Falana, SAN and his son, Folarin aka Falz.

The Falanas had instituted separate actions amounting to one billion naira as claims against the controversial activist, on the grounds that

his publication made on September 24, 2024, on his Instagram handle: @verydarkblackman wherein he specifically targeted the Claimants is libelous, Injurious, derogatory, scandalous and defamatory.

 

They also seek an order of perpetual injunction restraining the Defendant and his agents from further publishing the works and for him to publish an apology to them on all his social media handles and in one National Daily Newspaper.”

 

But, The Defendant (VDM) filed a preliminary objection asking the Court to dismiss the suits for want of jurisdiction.

 

He argued that the alleged offences were committed outside jurisdiction of the Lagos State High court.

 

But, The court found merit in the responses of the claimants who had argued that in cases of online defamation, jurisdiction lies in the place where the claimant accessed the material said to be libelous.

 

After the court’s ruling, Justice Azeez adjourned the matter till July 8 for mention as well as to enable the Defendant to file his defence to the substantive case.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

YouTube player
Get Breaking News Alerts on WhatsApp! Subscribe now and never miss an update
ADVERTISEMENT

Headlines

  • Live-Stream
  • World News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Tech
  • Entertainment

Shows

  • Issue With Jide
  • Journalist Hangout
  • This Morning
  • TVC Breakfast
  • Today in the news
  • Documentaries

Live TV

  • Windows & Mac
  • iPhone & iPad
  • Android & IOS

App Download

  • Download Android App
  • Download for iOS
  • HOME
  • ADVERT RATE
  • Contact

© 2022 TVC Communications - Owner of TVC News

No Result
View All Result
  • World News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Tech
  • Health
  • Entertainment
  • Show
    • Election 2023
    • Journalist Hangout
    • Issue With Jide
    • Trending Video
  • More
    • Advert Rate
    • Contact Us
    • Cookies Policy

© 2022 TVC Communications - Owner of TVC News

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In